<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recon on t0ul</title><link>https://t0ul.com/tags/recon/</link><description>Recent content in Recon on t0ul</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://t0ul.com/tags/recon/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The one half of pentesting small models are good at</title><link>https://t0ul.com/blog/gored-recon-is-the-bright-spot/</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://t0ul.com/blog/gored-recon-is-the-bright-spot/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Part of my GORED series, where I point small local language models at my own web apps and measure, honestly, whether they can break them. The &lt;a href="https://t0ul.com/blog/gored-the-question/"&gt;earlier posts&lt;/a&gt; are a pile of zeros on the exploit side. This one is the part that worked, and it changed how I think about where these models belong. The harness is &lt;a href="https://github.com/t0ul/GORED"&gt;t0ul/GORED&lt;/a&gt;. Every number comes from a kept, hash-verified trace.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>